首页> 外文OA文献 >Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients Receiving Antiplatelet Therapy at Stroke Onset
【2h】

Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients Receiving Antiplatelet Therapy at Stroke Onset

机译:卒中发作时接受抗血小板治疗的患者接受静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性卒中的安全性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and Purpose-Antiplatelets (APs) may increase the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) following intravenous thrombolysis after ischemic stroke. Methods-We assessed the safety of thrombolysis under APs in 11 865 patients compliant with the European license criteria and recorded between 2002 and 2007 in the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke (SITS) International Stroke Thrombolysis Register (SITS-ISTR). Outcome measures of univariable and multivariable analyses included symptomatic ICH (SICH) per SITS Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST [deterioration in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale >= 4 plus ICH type 2 within 24 hours]), per European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II (ECASS II [deterioration in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale >= 4 plus any ICH]), functional outcome at 3 months and mortality. Results-A total of 3782 (31.9%) patients had received 1 or 2 AP drugs at baseline: 3016 (25.4%) acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), 243 (2.0%) clopidogrel, 175 (1.5%) ASA and dipyridamole, 151 (1.3%) ASA and clopidogrel, and 197 (1.7%) others. Patients receiving APs were 5 years older and had more risk factors than AP nave patients. Incidences of SICH per SITS-MOST (ECASS II respectively) were as follows: 1.1% (4.1%) AP naive, 2.5% (6.2%) any AP, 2.5% (5.9%) ASA, 1.7% (4.2%) clopidogrel, 2.3% (5.9%) ASA and dipyridamole, and 4.1% (13.4%) ASA and clopidogrel. In multivariable analyses, the combination of ASA and clopidogrel was associated with increased risk for SICH per ECASS II (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.45; P = 0.003). However, we found no significant increase in the risk for mortality or poor functional outcome, irrespective of the AP subgroup or SICH definition. Conclusion-The absolute excess of SICH of 1.4% (2.1%) in the pooled AP group is small compared with the benefit of thrombolysis seen in randomized trials. Although caution is warranted in patients receiving the combination of ASA and clopidogrel, AP treatment should not be considered a contraindication to thrombolysis. (Stroke. 2010;41:288-294.)
机译:背景和目的-抗血小板(AP)可能会增加缺血性中风后静脉溶栓后发生症状性脑出血(ICH)的风险。方法-我们评估了11 865例符合欧洲许可标准的AP下溶栓的安全性,并将其记录在2002年至2007年的《中风治疗安全实施(SITS)国际中风溶栓登记册(SITS-ISTR)》中。根据SITS监测研究(SITS-MOST [美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表的恶化> = 4以及ICH 2型在24小时内恶化]),单项变量和多变量分析的结果指标,根据欧洲合作性急性卒中研究II (ECASS II [美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表的恶化> = 4加上任何ICH]),3个月时的功能结局和死亡率。结果-共有3782名(31.9%)患者在基线时已接受1或2种AP药物:3016(25.4%)乙酰水杨酸(ASA),243(2.0%)氯吡格雷,175(1.5%)ASA和双嘧达莫,151( 1.3%)ASA和氯吡格雷,其他197(1.7%)。接受AP的患者比未接受过AP的患者大5岁,并且有更多的危险因素。每个SITS-MOST(分别为ECASS II)的SICH发生率如下:未接受过AP的为1.1%(4.1%),未接受过AP的为2.5%(6.2%),使用了ASA的2.5%(5.9%),使用氯吡格雷的1.7%(4.2%), 2.3%(5.9%)ASA和潘生丁,以及4.1%(13.4%)ASA和氯吡格雷。在多变量分析中,ASA和氯吡格雷的组合与ECASS II的SICH风险增加相关(赔率比为2.11; 95%CI为1.29至3.45; P = 0.003)。但是,我们发现,无论AP亚组还是SICH定义,死亡或功能不良结果的风险均没有显着增加。结论-与随机试验中溶栓的获益相比,合并AP组的SICH绝对过量1.4%(2.1%)小。尽管接受ASA和氯吡格雷联用的患者应谨慎行事,但不应将AP治疗视为溶栓的禁忌证。 (中风.2010; 41:288-294。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号